There is a number of patches in the Debian BTS that has been pending
since before I took over maintainership of the package. I am wondering
what to do with them - a bunch seem relevant and I could bundle them
in debian/patches
but I am not sure I want to carry such a "fork" of
etckeeper forever, so I would prefer to approve them here first.
On the other hand, I do not want to flood you with 8 feature requests you have already seen. So I figured I would open a single todo item to quickly allow you to review the patch set:
519420 etckeeper: Add option to force commit after apt run.
Hack to force an empty commit to keep track of package changes.
Last change: Apr 2009. Marked "wontfix" in 2014.
549354 etckeeper: don't warn about ignored files
git-specific patch available, not sure how it behaves with other VCSes. seems to have at least another user (fmarier)
Last change: Oct 2010.
576915 30store-metadata: use GNUisms to achieve 1s runtime.
concerns about portability to solaris, is this still an issue?
Last change: Apr 2010.
592158 etckeeper: Example for tracking installed packages
sample post-install hook to keep track of installed packages in /etc. similar to #519420 - close?
Last change: Aug 2010
612029 etckeeper: Example hook for generating GPG-encrypted bundle
after every commit
another sample post-install hook to secretely ship a git bundle to a backup server
Last change: Feb 2011
613278 etckeeper: writing a commit message for the autocommit that
happens after apt
patch for git, with possible patch for bzr as well, requiring proposed upstream change for bzr, not merged.
last change: Sep 2013
698062 logout hook
yet another sample hook, by yours truly, add a new "logout" subcommand that can be added to bash_logout scripts.
last change: Jan 2013
777612 etckeeper should read XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config
look in standard locations for the git config, seems sound
last change: Feb 2015
So to simplify, there are those groups of proposed changes:
- sample hooks (592158, 612029, 698062)
- bugfixes (549354, 777612)
- features and improvements (519420, 576915, 613278)
So any opinion about what to do with those? Should I submit them as separate issues? Or should I ask the original reporters to do that here? Or should I just close those issues?
Thanks! -- ?anarcat